If you are really confused between PS vita and Nintendo 3ds, then we are here to show you how they are different from each other and which one is the best.
Features comparison.
So firstly let just talk about Nintendo 3ds, the greatest advantage of 3ds over Vita is the
glass free 3d gaming in a 3.53" display at 800*240p(400*240p per eye) with a custom setting 3d slider to increase or decrease the 3d depth. but the bad about the display is that the 3d effects in 3ds get lost when seen from a wider angle and also when screen is not focused properly. The screen also causes headache while focusing many time on the images to regain the lost 3d effects, so this is definitely not a great glass free 3d screen as many as other available in the market.
3ds normally feature a bottom resistive touch screen of 3.02" at 320*240p for in game controls as previous Nintendo ds, 3 axis accelerometer and a 3axis gyroscopic sensor for motion gaming, two rear facing VGA camera for stereoscopic video recording and still images and a front facing VGA camera, a 2.4ghz wireless connectivity with enhance
WPA2 security.
On the other hand PS vita offer a high resolution 5" oled multi-touch capacitive display running at
960 × 544 pixels @ 220 ppi with a new interface called
LiveArea totally different from the predecessors psp and from ps3 too. A rear multi-touch surface for in game control a new concept by Sony, six axis motion sensor( 3 axis accelerometer and a 3 axis gyroscopic sensor), A digital compass and dual analog stick, and offer two VGA camera one on rear and one on front with Skype support,
IEEE 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi, 3G,Bluetooth 2.1+EDR.
* So PS vita has a better display but lacks 3d.
* Dual analog stick and rear multi-touch are the great feature over 3ds.
* 3ds lack 3g option and a bluetooth too.
* PS vita has a great design compared to flipped 3ds design.
* Cross-connectivity with ps3 is really great feature in PS vita.
* PS vita support Skype for video call.
Performance comparison.
3ds uses a
Pica 200 gpu which is based on a complex architect not yet revealed but really not as fast as the PS vita's sgx543mp4+ gpu which is a quad core gpu running at 200mhz per core and able to render 133m polygon/sec approx 390m triangle/sec at 200mhz and 266m polygon/sec approx 780m triangle/sec at 400mhz but
Pica 200 only able to render 15.3m polygon/sec at (40m triangle/sec @ 100mhz) and (160m triangle/sec @ 400mhz), this makes the PS vita a great gaming performer with high quality graphic like ps3 at 5" oled multi-touch.
Now come to memory and processor the Nintendo has a 233mhz dual core Arm11 processor,64mb ram on other hand PS vita offer a quad core cortex A9 processor running at 800mhz and a 512 MB of ram. so the performance of PS vita is on the par as compared to 3ds.
In terms of title PS vita offer hot titles from ps3 with great graphics.Like uncharted, little big planet, dust 514 and much more exciting one while 3ds to offer interesting title as Nintendo focus on title but comparing both of them PS vita has best titles and upcoming title on greatest engines too.
Similarity.
* Both support augmented reality gaming.
* Both offer backward compatibility.
* Both priced 249$.
So finally PS vita wins, a great package for your 249$.
but still wants to play in 3d then go for 3ds but PS vita is really great a handheld ever.
PS vita wins..